1 and 2. OT18: Justices Breyer and Alito failed to recuse in Feng v. Komenda and Rockwell Collins, Inc., despite owning shares in Rockwell’s parent company, United Technologies Corp.; missed recusal on 1/14/19 (cert. denied). FTC identified this conflict on 4/8/19, two and a half months after cert. was denied, and the Supreme Court responded that afternoon, saying that the justices would have had “no way” to know about the conflict since the company in question waived the right to respond. FTC finds that reasoning spurious.
3. OT17: Chief Justice Roberts failed to recuse in Marcus Roberts et al. v. AT&T Mobility despite owning shares in Time-Warner, which had merged with AT&T four days prior; missed recusal on 6/18/18 (cert. denied). FTC identified this conflict five months after cert. was denied, and no further action has been taken.
4. OT17: Justice Kennedy failed to recuse in Washington v. U.S. despite his previous work on the case; missed recusal on 1/2/18 (cert. granted); reported and recused on 3/23/18.
5. and 6. OT16 and OT17: Justice Kagan failed to recuse in Jennings v. Rodriguez despite her previous work on the case; missed recusal on 11/30/16 (argued) and 10/3/17 (reargued); reported and recused on 11/10/17.
7. OT16: Chief Justice Roberts failed to recuse in Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp. despite owning shares in Thermo Fisher Scientific, which owns Life Technologies; missed recusal on 12/6/16 (argued); reported and recused on 1/4/17.
8. OT15: Justice Breyer failed to recuse in FERC v. EPSA despite owning shares in Johnson Controls, a party on the EPSA side; missed recusal on 10/14/15 (argued), reported and remained on case on 10/15/15. Breyer did not recuse at first, learned about the conflict the day after oral argument in FERC v. EPSA and then sold his stock – or his wife did – that day.
9. OT15: Chief Justice Roberts failed to recuse in ABB Inc., et al. v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al., despite owning shares in Texas Instruments stock, a party on the ABB side; missed recusal on 10/5/15 (cert. denied), reported on 12/18/15. FTC identified this conflict two months after cert. was denied and brought it to the chief’s attention. No further action was taken.
10. OT12: In 2012, Justice Sotomayor received $1.925 million in book advances from Knopf Doubleday, owned by Random House. On 4/15/13, SCOTUS denied cert. in Greenspan v. Random House, Inc., et al. Breyer recused since he or his wife own shares in a publishing company with a large stake in Random House; Sotomayor did not. Though advances are not included in the federal recusal law, a nearly $2 million payout within a year of a case would seem to qualify as an instances where a justice’s “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” FTC identified this conflict on 5/31/19; no further action was taken.